1. Upananda.– A thera. He belonged to the Sākyan clan. Several incidents connected with him are mentioned in the Vinaya. Once he promised to spend the Rains (vassa) with Pasenadi Kosala, but on his way there he saw two lodgings where robes were plentiful and so observed the Rains in those lodgings instead. Pasenadi was greatly annoyed and when, in due course, the matter reached the ears of the Buddha, Upananda was rebuked and a set of rules was passed regarding promises made about the rainy season (Vin.i.153).
On another occasion Upananda spent the rainy season at Sāvatthi, but when the time came for the monks to gather together and divide the robes that had been given to them, he went from village to village, taking his share of the robes from everywhere. The Buddha sent for him and rebuked him in the presence of the Order, but the rebuke evidently had no effect, for we find him again spending the vassa alone in two residences, with the idea of obtaining many robes. The Buddha, however, ordered that only one portion should be given to him (Vin.i.300).
His greediness was not confined to robes. Once he was invited to a meal by an official, a follower of the Ājīvakā. He went late, and finding no room left for him, made a junior monk get up and give him his seat. There was a great uproar, but Upananda had his way (Vin.ii.165).
Elsewhere he is accused of having appropriated two lodgings for himself at the same time, one at Sāvatthi and the other somewhere in the country. He was evidently unpopular among the monks, because on this occasion we find him spoken of as “a maker of strife, quarrelsome, a maker of disputes, given to idle talk, a raiser of legal questions.” (Vin.ii.168). Upananda was fond of money, for we find in the Vinaya (Vin.ii.297) a statement to the effect that “on the occasion of the matter of Upananda the Sākyan, the Buddha distinctly laid down a precept by which gold and silver were forbidden.” Upananda had been given his meals regularly by a certain family. Once a dish of meat was prepared for him, but a little boy in the house started to cry for the meat, and it was given to him. Upananda insisted that a kahāpaṇa should be paid to him in lieu of the meat (Vin.iii.236 f). Upananda was once asked to teach those that came to Jetavana. Among the visitors was a banker, and when the banker expressed the desire to give something to Upananda to show his appreciation of the discourse, Upananda wished to have the robe that the man wore. The banker was embarrassed, and promised to go home at once and fetch him another robe, even better than the one he had on. However, Upananda was adamant, until, in despair, the man gave him his robe and went away. Again, when Upananda heard that a certain man wished to offer him a robe, he went to the man and told him what kind of robe he wanted, and said he would accept no other (Vin.iii.215).
A story is also told of a wanderer (paribbājaka) exchanging his own garment for one belonging to Upananda, which was of rich colour. Two other wanderers told him that he had lost in the bargain, so he wished to cry off the deal, but Upananda positively refused (Vin.iii.240 f). He did not, however, always come off best in a bargain. Once he gave a robe to a colleague, on condition that the latter should join him on his tours. The condition was agreed to, but later, when the recipient monk heard that the Buddha was going on tour, he preferred to join the Buddha’s company. The robe was not returned to Upananda, who had to be reported to the Buddha for the violent language he used to the defaulter (Vin.iii.254 f). Upananda is mentioned as quarrelling with the group of six monks (Chabbaggiyā) (Vin.iv.30) and, at another time, as going his alms-
Nor were all Upananda’s misdemeanours confined to greed for possessions. We are told that once a complaint was made to the Buddha that Upananda had gone to the house of an acquaintance and had sat down in the bedroom of the woman of the house, talking to her. The husband ordered food to be brought to Upananda, and when that was done, asked him to leave. However, the woman wished him to stay and he refused to go away (Vin.iv.94).
On two other occasions he is mentioned as visiting the houses of his acquaintances and being found by the husbands, seated alone with their wives (Vin.iv.95‑7; see also 121, 127 and 168, for other offences committed by him).
With most laymen, however, be was evidently popular. Mention is made of a meal where the donor kept all the other monks waiting for quite a long while, until Upananda should arrive, after his visits to various households (Vin.iv.98). And, again, of food being sent to the monastery with express instructions that the other monks should eat only after Upananda had done so (Vin.iv.99).
Episodes regarding Upananda’s misdeeds are not confined to the Vinaya. In the Dabbhapuppha Jātaka (J.iii.332 ﬀ; see also DhA.iii.139 ﬀ) we are told that he was in the habit of teaching contentment to others. When they, touched by his teaching, cast away their good robes, etc., Upananda collected them for himself. Once he cheated two brethren of a costly blanket. When the matter was brought to the Buddha’s notice, this Jātaka was related to show how in previous births, too, he had plundered other people’s goods. He had been a jackal called Māyāvī, and had cheated two other jackals of a red fish they had caught. Again, in the Samudda Jātaka (J.ii.441 f), he is described as a great eater and drinker; he would not be satisfied even with cart-
Buddhaghosa calls him a lolajātika, held in contempt by his eighty thousand fellow Sākyā who joined the Order (Sp.iii.665). Elsewhere he is referred to as a well-
Upananda had under him two novices, Kaṇṭaka and Mahaka, who seem to have resembled their teacher in being undesirables. They were found guilty of an unnatural offence, and the Buddha ordered that no one should ordain them (Vin.i.79). This order seems to have been rescinded later (see Vin.i.83).